It’s been a while since a non-incumbent major ticket presidential candidate has stirred up as much enmity as Hillary Clinton. I certainly wasn’t a fan of George W. Bush when he ran originally, but it took the first term of his presidency for me to develop the visceral dislike I – and millions – harbor toward him now. But, somehow, Hillary has already managed to generate that kind of heat, not only with Republicans, but among many Democrats. Which is somehow…impressive, in a really macabre way.
And while some would say a Hillary Clinton presidency would be fitting retribution for 8 years of W., it’s never a good thing when a President invokes such strong negative reactions from a sizable portion of the country. It’s a terrible feeling to despise your President. It may be a sign of democracy’s success, but I wouldn’t want a sizable minority of the country to go through the same thing next time. And I don’t think Obama and McCain would polarize us nearly as much.
I know it’s unfair to Clinton to a degree, because she’s toting a lot of her husband’s baggage. But you don’t get to be President just because you really, really, really want it, as we learned from Bob Dole, Adlai Stevenson and Alf Landon.
Sometimes you need to take your ego out of it. Richard Nixon did just that when he chose not to dispute the 1960 electoral results. Al Gore fought the good fight in 2000, then gracefully conceded, even if he did go on to a rather annoying Hollywood existence. Hillary should follow suit, even though I think there’s little chance she will.
The irony is that the people Hillary wants to help the most are the ones facing the greatest risk if she stays in and loses in November. They, and the rest of us, deserve better.